Intelligent Knowledge Exploration and Processing

Intelligent Knowledge Exploration and Processing

Challenges of Sports Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Legal Necessities for Protecting Athletes' Rights

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD, Department of Sports Management, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 PhD Student, Sports Management, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract
The extensive developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) have had a profound impact on the sports industry and have transformed its management, monitoring, and performance dimensions. This study aims to examine the effects of artificial intelligence on sports rights and analyze its legal and ethical challenges. The research method is comparative, legal, and descriptive, and analyzes the existing challenges by examining practical examples on a global scale. The findings show that artificial intelligence can transform the methods of managing sports rights and evaluating athletes' performance; however, if legal and ethical considerations are not observed, there is a possibility of threatening the individual and social rights of athletes, including violating privacy and creating discrimination. Accordingly, the study emphasizes that the responsible use of artificial intelligence requires the development of comprehensive and efficient legal and ethical frameworks. Although the developments resulting from artificial intelligence in the sports industry have provided significant opportunities for improving sports management, evaluation, and performance, they have also brought significant legal and ethical challenges. The findings of this study show that without the development and implementation of strict legal and ethical frameworks, the use of this technology can lead to privacy violations, discrimination in sports decision-making, and the violation of athletes’ individual and social rights. Accordingly, the development of comprehensive and flexible regulations that are updated in line with technological advances is essential. In addition, international cooperation between sports, legal, and technological institutions can play a key role in ensuring justice and protecting sports rights in this digital age. The future of the sports industry will depend on creating a smart balance between technological innovations and sustainable legal and ethical principles.
Keywords

1.       Alonso, C., Kothari, S., & Rehman, S. (2020, December 2). How artificial intelligence could widen the gap between rich and poor nations. IMF Blog.
2.       Asian Intergovernmental Commission On Human Rights. (2009). AICHR. https://aichr.org/
3.       Beltramini, E. (2019). Life 3.0. Being human in the age of artificial intelligence, by Max Tegmark. Religion & Theology, 26(1-2), 169–171.
4.       Brundage, M., Avin, S., & Ors. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention and Mitigation. Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford: Arizona State University.
5.       Burdon, M., & McKillop, A. (2013). The google street vew Wi-Fi scandal and its repercussions for privacy regulation. Monash University Law Review, 39(3), 703-738.
6.       Burotowski, M. (2016). The DNC server breach: Who did it and what does it mean. Network Security, 2016(10) 5-7.
7.       Council of Europe. (2014). European Convention on Human Rights. The European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-convention
8.       Council of Europe. (2020). Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI): Feasibility Study. https://rm.coe.int/cahai-2020-23-final-eng-feasibility-study-/1680a0c6da
9.       Council of Europe. (2023). Committee on Artificial Intelligence: Revised Zero Draft [Framework] Convention on Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. https://rm.coe. int/cai-2023-01-revised-zero-draft-framework-convention-public/1680aa193f
10.   Dastin, J. (2018, October 11). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters.
11.   Elliott, D., & Soifer, E. (2022). AI technologies, privacy and security. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5.
12.   European Commission. (2024). Commission signs Council of Europe framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-signs-council-europe-framework-convention-artificial-intelligence
13.   Ferrone, V. (2017). The rights of history: Enlightenment and human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 39(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2017.0004
14.   Finio, M., & Downie, A. (2023). What is Artificial Intelligence in Finance. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/ topics/artificial-intelligence-finance
15.   Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 114, 254–280.
16.   Giligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-Learning. Education Science, 13(12) 1216.
17.   Gillis, T. B., & Spiess, J. L. (2019). Big data and discrimination. The University of Chicago Law Review, 86(2), 459-488.
18.   Helmus, T. C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes and Disinformation: A Primer. RAND National Security Research Division.
19.   Human Right Watch. (2023). US: Congress must regulate artificial intelligence to protect rights. Human Right Watch.
20.   International Telecommunication Union. (2021). United Nations activities on artificial intelligence (AI). ITUPublications.
21.   Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications for industry 4.0: A literature-based study. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 7(1), 1–29.
22.   Kamal, H. (2017). Prinsip hak asasi manusia menurut perspektif undang-undang antarabangsa dan hukum syarak: Suatu perbandingan [Human Rights Principles According to International Law and Syariah Perspectives: A Comparison]. Kanun, 26(1), 72-100.
23.   Kateb, G. (2011). Human Dignity. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24.   Khong, D. W. K., & Mon S. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a common heritage of mankind. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 113-139.
25.   Kolfschooten, H. (2023). The Council of Europe’s AI Convention (2023-2024): Promises and pitfalls for health protection. Health Policy, 138.
26.   Lin, T-A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in a sturcturally unjust society. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 8(3/4).
27.   Lyu, Y., Wang, X., Lin, R., & Wu, J. (2022). Communication in human-AI co-creation: Preceptual analysis of paintings generated by text-to-image system. Appl. Sci., 12(22), 11312.
28.    
29.   Nolan, D., Maryam, H., & Kleinman, M. (2024). The Urgent but Difficult Task of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Amnesty International.
30.   Nor, M. M. (2016). Hak Asasi Manusia Antarabangsa dan Islam [International Human Rights and Islam]. Paperwork, Understanding International Human Rights and Islam Workshop, Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur.
31.   Pabubung, M. R. (2023). Era kecerdasan buatan dan dampak terhadap martabat manusia dalam kajian etis [The era of artificial intelligence and the impact on human dignity in ethical studies]. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(1), 66-75.
32.   Peters, U. (2022). Algorithmic political bias in artificial intelligence systems. Philos Technol, 35(2), 25.
33.   Podolsky, M. (2023). How AI in Customer Service Affects the Role of Human Agents. Linked In Pulse.
34.   Rashid, A., Kausik, A. K. & Ors. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the military: An overview of the capabilities, applications and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023(4), 1-31.
35.   Shaheer, S. (2023). The Rise of AI- A Threat to Global Employment? LinkedIn Pulse. https://www. linkedin.com/pulse/rise-ai-threat-global-employment-shahazeen-shaheer
36.   Suleimanova, S. (2024). Comparative legal analysis of the role of artificial intelligence in human rights protection: Prospects for Europe and the Middle East. Pakistan journal of Criminology, 16(3), 907-922.
37.   Svityk, T. (2016). 3 Types of Artificial Intelligence Everyone Knows About. LETZGRO. http://letzgro.net/blog/3-types-of-artificial-intelligence
38.   Taulli, T. (2019). Artificial intelligence basics: A non-technical introduction. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5028-0
39.   The Guardian. (2021). Pegasus: The Spyware Technology that Threatens Democracy. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7H9uo3j5FQ&t=199s.
40.   The White House. (2022). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
41.   Tiwari, R. (2023). The impact of AI and machine learning on job displacement and employment opportunities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 7(1).
42.   UNHR. (2023). Artificial intelligence must be grounded in human rights, says High Commissioner. OHCHR.
43.   United Nations. (1945). United Nations Charter. United Nations.
44.   United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. OHCHR; United Nations.
45.   United Nations. (2023). Human rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/human- rights
46.   United Nations. (2023). The foundation of international human rights law. United Nations.
47.   United Nations. (2024). Governing AI for humanity: Final report. United Nations.
48.   Whitecase. (2024). AI watch: Global regulatory tracker – European Union. White & Case.
49.   Wibowo, A. (2021). Heidegger dan bahaya teknologi [Heidegger and The Danger of Technology]. Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam, 6(2), 221-242.
50.   Wood, J., Nguyen, T., Sharda, S., & Schlosser, A. (2017). ASEAN 4.0: What does the Fourth Industrial Revolution mean for regional economic integration? World Economic Forum and the Asian Development Bank.
51.   Zhang, F. (2023). Copyright Issues in Artificial Intelligence: A comprehensive examination from the perspectives of subject and object. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socia-Humanities, 15(1), 172-182.